[md PATCH 07/14] Revert "md/raid5: limit request size according to implementation limits"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This reverts commit e8d7c33232e5fdfa761c3416539bc5b4acd12db5.

Now that raid5 doesn't abuse bi_phys_segments any more, we no longer
need to impose these limits.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index f93e8fddbb23..c96fca2c6a98 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -7100,15 +7100,6 @@ static int raid5_run(struct mddev *mddev)
 			stripe = (stripe | (stripe-1)) + 1;
 		mddev->queue->limits.discard_alignment = stripe;
 		mddev->queue->limits.discard_granularity = stripe;
-
-		/*
-		 * We use 16-bit counter of active stripes in bi_phys_segments
-		 * (minus one for over-loaded initialization)
-		 */
-		blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mddev->queue, 0xfffe * STRIPE_SECTORS);
-		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(mddev->queue,
-					      0xfffe * STRIPE_SECTORS);
-
 		/*
 		 * unaligned part of discard request will be ignored, so can't
 		 * guarantee discard_zeroes_data


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux