Hi, I never said THANKS. Never too late ;o) ------------------------- Santiago DIEZ ------------------------- Quark Systems & CAOBA 23 rue du Buisson Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris ------------------------- On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 27/10/16 15:11, Santiago DIEZ wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Indeed, here is what I had in terms of event count: >> /dev/sda10: 81589 >> /dev/sdb10: 81626 >> /dev/sdc10: 81589 >> >> Then the following procedure worked quite straightforward: >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # mdadm --assemble /dev/md10 --verbose --force /dev/sda10 /dev/sdb10 /dev/sdc10 >> # mdadm --manage /dev/md10 --add /dev/sdd10 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> And 6h+ later: >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # cat /proc/mdstat >> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] >> md10 : active raid5 sdd10[3] sda10[0] sdc10[2] sdb10[1] >> 5778741888 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Then I ran: >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> # e2fsck -f -n -t -v /dev/md10 >> e2fsck 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012) >> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes >> Pass 2: Checking directory structure >> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity >> Pass 4: Checking reference counts >> Pass 5: Checking group summary information >> >> 15675837 inodes used (4.34%, out of 361177088) >> 188798 non-contiguous files (1.2%) >> 14751 non-contiguous directories (0.1%) >> # of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 0/0/0 >> Extent depth histogram: 15626455/47037/15 >> 1281308341 blocks used (88.69%, out of 1444685472) >> 0 bad blocks >> 101 large files >> >> 15311457 regular files >> 361754 directories >> 0 character device files >> 0 block device files >> 0 fifos >> 0 links >> 2607 symbolic links (2310 fast symbolic links) >> 10 sockets >> ------------ >> 15675828 files >> Memory used: 50976k/1912k (20541k/30436k), time: 1304.00/334.06/ 8.00 >> I/O read: 4891MB, write: 0MB, rate: 3.75MB/s >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Does it look OK enough to launch the mount? >> > sorry - I've been away for the weekend - daughter's wedding :-) > > But yes, that looks great. No errors on fsck either, I think :-) > > I think your array looks fine. Just look at the output from smartctl for > your old drives and make sure that it doesn't look like another drive is > going to fail soon. I'm not quite sure what to look for, mostly bad > blocks and relocates, I think, but if you compare it with your new drive > and stuff looks dodgy, you can always ask for help. > > Cheers, > Wol > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
