Re: [GIT PULL] MD update for 4.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I did try your patch and it improved 10% in my machine, but this isn't
> relevent to the pull. We can do the tunning later if necessary. I'm
> hoping the intel guys can share some hints, but apparently Linus isn't a
> fan for such tuning.

We've had horrible experiences with prefetching in the past.  We've
seen microarchitectures that do really bad things when the prefetch
takes a TLB miss, for example, and suddenly they stall on the
prefetch, and actually slow the code down.

Admittedly, most of the bad cases are probably not a big deal for
streaming raid rebuild code, so it may well be that it works better
there.

So I'm not categorically against prefetching, but it needs to be
tested across a lot of different (micro-)architectures. Right now, I
guess something very specific like AVX512 means effectively just one
or two microarchitectures and then it's easy to say "it always helps".

The worst cases for the kernel have generally been in generic code.

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux