> If you continue discussing after that point, I guess that such a condition is not needed. > then you make a clear statement that it isn't an accident. I hope that most of my software development activities are not "an accident". Is the intent for any update suggestion (like the renaming of a jump label in this case) reasonable to some degree? > You are deliberately wasting their time. I imagine that I do not really try to "waste" others time. But I am trying also to change some "things". There are circumstances when these contributions are interpreted as "wasted efforts". Is the change acceptance usually higher for other update patterns? > Something along "I will not listen. I am listening while my responses might not fit to your current expectations. > I will not change. I have got also some personal change opportunities. > Nothing you tell me will ever make it worth your time to do so"? While you can be so clear about a rejection for this software module at the moment, other contributors showed occasionally more positive information. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
