Re: kernel checksumming performance vs actual raid device performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/23/2016 3:19 PM, Doug Dumitru wrote:
> Mr. Ledford,
> 
> I am glad that we are in agreement.  My issue is that if the customer
> is reading 4GB/sec with a non-degraded array, the degraded array
> should only have 2X the number of IOs and 2X the transfer sizes to the
> drives.  If the data rate falls to 1GB, I can suspect cpu overhead.
> With this case falling to 200MB/sec, then something else is going on.
> 
> SSDs tend to be very "flat" reading from q=1 up to about q=20 assuming
> the HBAs can keep up.

Is he using SSDs?  If so, I missed that bit.  I wrote my response
assuming rotating media.




-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
    GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux