Re: [PATCH] mdadm: add man page for --add-journal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Adam and Jes. 

These looks good to me. 

PS: we will make “add-journal” more flexible, and revise the man page accordingly. 

Song

>> On 8/15/16, 7:42 AM, "Jes Sorensen" <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    > On 13/08/2016 00:58, Jes Sorensen wrote:
    >> Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> writes:
    >>> Add the following to man page:
    >>>
    >>> --add-journal
    >>>        Recreate journal for RAID-4/5/6 array that losts journal
    >>>        devices. In current implementation, this command cannot
    >>>        add journal to an array that had failed journal.  To
    >>>        avoid  interrupting  on-going  write  opertions,
    >>>        --add-journal only works for array in Read-Only state.
    >>>
    >>> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yizhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
    >>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
    >>> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
    >>> ---
    >>>   mdadm.8.in | 8 ++++++++
    >>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
    >> Applied, with a few minor mods.
    >>
    >> I changed it to say this, I hope you are fine with that:
    >>
    >> "Recreate journal for RAID-4/5/6 array that lost a journal device. In the
    >> current implementation, this command cannot add a journal to an array
    >> that had a failed journal. To avoid interrupting on-going write
    >> opertions, "
    > I think this might be more correct:
    >
    > "Recreate journal for RAID-4/5/6 array that lost a journal device. In the
    > current implementation, this command cannot add a journal to an array
    > that *has* a failed journal. To avoid interrupting on-going write
    > *operations*, "
    >
    >
    > Note the two words modified have **
    > has mean currently, if it had (past) a failed journal, but that has
    > already been fixed, then it currently has a working journal, and so I
    > assume this patch is not relevant. It's only related to if the array
    > is currently missing a journal...
    > The second operations is just a typo...
    >
    > Hope you don't mind my jumping in here, I can't help much with code,
    > but hopefully contribution is still helpful.
    
    If Song is happy with this and you send me a patch, I'll be happy to
    apply it.
    
    Cheers,
    Jes
    

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����w��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux