Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 07/07/2016 06:16 PM, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
>> Hi Xiao,
>>
>> I think you're right that mdadm -IRs should return 0 in this case.
>> IncrementalScan should not try loading a container from a member array,
>> because that will always fail. Can you check if this fixes the problem
>> for you?
>>
>> diff --git a/Incremental.c b/Incremental.c
>> index ba97b00..cc01d41 100644
>> --- a/Incremental.c
>> +++ b/Incremental.c
>> @@ -1347,8 +1347,12 @@ restart:
>> if (devnm && strcmp(devnm, me->devnm) != 0)
>> continue;
>> - if (devnm && me->metadata[0] == '/') {
>> + if (me->metadata[0] == '/') {
>> char *sl;
>> +
>> + if (!devnm)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> /* member array, need to work on container */
>> strncpy(container, me->metadata+1, 32);
>> container[31] = 0;
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Artur
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Hi Artur
>
> Sorry for late response. I have been waiting the result from customer
> and the customer haven't give me the answer. I tested this in my
> environment and this patch can fix this problem.
Artur,
Do you have a version of this patch you would like me to apply to the
official mdadm tree?
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
