On Wed, Aug 03 2016, liuzhengyuan wrote: > Thanks for you replay. > I think it may be on the temp inactive list. An active sh was handled > and put to temp inactive list firstly, then moved to inactive list. > If sh is on the temp inactive list, sh->count is zero too. Hmmm... yes, you are probably right. Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature