Re: [PATCH] raid5: fix incorrectly counter of conf->empty_inactive_list_nr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 03 2016, liuzhengyuan wrote:

> Thanks for you replay.
> I think it may be on the temp inactive list. An active sh was handled
> and put to temp inactive list firstly, then moved to inactive list.
> If sh is on the temp inactive list,  sh->count is zero too.

Hmmm... yes, you are probably right.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux