Re: Lost RAID6 disks when moving to new PC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:35:34AM +0100, Alex Owen wrote:
> The array should be RAID6 on /dev/sd{a-f}.

Full disk raid sucks. Zero advantages, lots of additional risk. 
There are too many programs out there that expect every disk to have 
a partition table, and will use it unasked if it looks unpartitioned.

You seem to have lost your md metadata to some partitioner/installer, 
you're also the third person with this problem in a row. Congrats. ;)

> fdisk -l :

Your fdisk doesn't support GPT, don't use it.

> parted
> Disk /dev/sd[bcd]: 3001GB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
> Partition Table: gpt
> 
> Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name                          Flags
>  1      17.4kB  134MB   134MB                Microsoft reserved
> partition  msftres
>  2      135MB   3001GB  3000GB               Basic data partition
>     msftdata

Well, something put GPT partition table on those. GPT overwrites start 
and end of the disk. You're using 1.2 metadata which is located 4K from 
the start, can you show some hexdump for those disks?

hexdump -C -s 4096 -n 4096 /dev/sdb

> And the output of mdadm --examine /dev/sd[a-f]
> 
> ----------
> 
> /dev/sda:
>           Magic : a92b4efc
>         Version : 1.2
>     Feature Map : 0x0
>      Array UUID : b377d975:86beb86c:9da9f21d:f73b2451
>            Name : NAS:0  (local to host NAS)
>   Creation Time : Sat Jan 23 17:57:37 2016
>      Raid Level : raid6
>    Raid Devices : 6
> 
>  Avail Dev Size : 5860271024 (2794.40 GiB 3000.46 GB)
>      Array Size : 11720540160 (11177.58 GiB 12001.83 GB)
>   Used Dev Size : 5860270080 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB)
>     Data Offset : 262144 sectors
>    Super Offset : 8 sectors
>           State : clean
>     Device UUID : 013740d6:5cc445e7:625f3257:8608daec
> 
>     Update Time : Tue Jul 26 04:09:29 2016
>        Checksum : 14ba6ebd - correct
>          Events : 2949004
> 
>          Layout : left-symmetric
>      Chunk Size : 512K
> 
>    Device Role : Active device 2
>    Array State : AAAAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)

> /dev/sdb:
>    MBR Magic : aa55
> Partition[0] :   4294967295 sectors at            1 (type ee)
> /dev/sdc:
>    MBR Magic : aa55
> Partition[0] :   4294967295 sectors at            1 (type ee)
> /dev/sdd:
>    MBR Magic : aa55
> Partition[0] :   4294967295 sectors at            1 (type ee)

Basically what we know is... your disk order for three disks 

(/dev/sde = role 0, /dev/sdf = role 1, /dev/sda= role 2)

and what we don't know is the disk order of /dev/sd[bcd].

If the metadata is lost completely, only thing you can do is re-create 
the RAID with all possible orders efa{bcd,bdc,cbd,cdb,dbc,dcb}.

Re-creating is dangerous so you should use an overlay: https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Recovering_a_failed_software_RAID#Making_the_harddisks_read-only_using_an_overlay_file

When re-creating you have to specify all variables (level, layout, chunksize, 
data offset, order, ...) since the defaults picked by mdadm might differ 
depending on your mdadm version.

Example command: (untested)

mdadm --create /dev/md42 --assume-clean \
      --level=6 --chunk=512 --data-offset=128M --layout=ls \
      /dev/overlay/sd{e,f,a,b,c,d}

Then you check if it can be mounted, and once mounted if big files 
(larger than chunksize * number of disks) are intact or no. If you 
switch the wrong two disks it may mount but data is garbage anyway.

Regards
Andreas Klauer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux