Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] bcache: Remove redundant parameter for cache_alloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2016/6/29 18:20, Coly Li 写道:
> 在 16/6/22 上午10:10, Yijing Wang 写道:
>> Cache_sb is not used in cache_alloc, and we have copied
>> sb info to cache->sb already, remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/md/bcache/super.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>> index f5dbb4e..aecaace 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>> @@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ void bch_cache_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static int cache_alloc(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache *ca)
>> +static int cache_alloc(struct cache *ca)
>>  {
>>  	size_t free;
>>  	struct bucket *b;
>> @@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct page *sb_page,
>>  	if (blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(ca->bdev)))
>>  		ca->discard = CACHE_DISCARD(&ca->sb);
>>  
>> -	ret = cache_alloc(sb, ca);
>> +	ret = cache_alloc(ca);
> 
> I am not sure whether struct cache_b *sb will be used in future, I
> suggest to let it be for now.
> 

We have copied sb to ca->sb, so if we need sb info in future, we could get info from ca->sb.

Thanks!
Yijing.

> 
> 
>>  	if (ret != 0)
>>  		goto err;
>>  
>>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux