----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shaohua Li" <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Xiao Ni" <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jes Sorensen" <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 1:59:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Need update superblock on time when deciding to do reshape
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:54:09PM +0800, Xiao Ni wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > If the disks are not enough to have spaces for relocating the data_offset,
> > it needs to run start_reshape and then run mdadm --grow --continue by
> > systemd. But mdadm --grow --continue fails because it checkes that
> > info->reshape_active is 0.
> >
> > The info->reshape_active is set to 1 when the superblock feature_map
> > have the flag MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE. Superblock feature_map is set
> > MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE as mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector.
> >
> > Function start_reshape calls raid5_start_reshape which changes
> > mddev->reshape_position to 0. Then in md_check_recovery it updates the
> > superblock to underlying devices. But there is a chance that the superblock
> > haven't written to underlying devices, the mdadm reads the superblock data.
> > So mdadm --grow --continue fails.
> >
> > The steps to reproduce this:
> > mdadm -CR /dev/md0 -l5 -n3 /dev/loop[0-2] --bitmap=internal
> > mdadm --wait /dev/md0
> > mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/loop3
> > mdadm --grow --raid-devices 4 /dev/md0
> > The loop device size is 500MB
> >
> > [root@storageqe-09 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
> > Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> > md0 : active raid5 loop3[4] loop2[3] loop1[1] loop0[0]
> > 1021952 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4]
> > [UUUU]
> > [>....................] reshape = 0.0% (1/510976) finish=0.0min
> > speed=255488K/sec
> > bitmap: 1/1 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> what's the bad effect of the --continue failure? I think reshape will still
> continue. Doing a update super there is ok, but I'm wondering if it's the
> good
> way. Could mdadm wait for MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE then let systemd run?
> Because sounds like we are working around systemd bug, kernel itself will
> write
> superblock anyway soon, so we probably working around in userspace.
There is no bad effect if --continue failure. It just miss one chance to
go on reshaping. Yes, as you said we can fix this in userspace. I tried
to start mdadm-grow-continue@.service 30 seconds later as mdadm-last-resort@.service
does. It can fix this too.
Sure it should be fixed this if mdadm try more times to check MD_FEATURE_RESHAPE_ACTIVE.
>
> > unused devices: <none>
> >
> > So if we update the superblock on time, mdadm can read the right superblock
> > data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/md/md.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > index 14d3b37..7919606 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -4350,6 +4350,7 @@ action_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *page,
> > size_t len)
> > else {
> > clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
> > err = mddev->pers->start_reshape(mddev);
> > + md_update_sb(mddev, 1);
>
> write super even err != 0?
Ah, sorry for this. It should update superblock only err is 0.
At first I want to fix this in userspace, but I ask myself why shouldn't update
the superblock once start_reshape returns. There are some guys waiting for the
update. The function action_store should update the superblock in time to tell
the colleagues what happens now. Then I checked the places where md_update_sb
is called. I found it is indeed called in some places where the md device
changes. So I sent the patch here.
By the way, in size_store it update the superblock when err != 0. Is it right
to check err there?
Best Regards
Xiao
>
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
