On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:31:28PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29 2016, Étienne Buira wrote: ../.. > > I guess sb->new_offset should be called sb->delta_offset. If you look > in md_p.h you will see: > > __le32 new_offset; /* signed number to add to data_offset in new > * layout. 0 == no-change. This can be > * different on each device in the array. > */ > > which goes some way to explaining the situation. > > NeilBrown Hi Neil, Thank you for the explanation, i have also looked at the sb loading counterpart, and indeed, PAX did catch a false positive here. For the record, the bug have been reported on Gentoo bugtracker [1]. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578502 Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
