Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> It complains when building on s390 and i686 platform.
>
> Signed-off-by : Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Monitor.c | 2 +-
> util.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Monitor.c b/Monitor.c
> index f19c2e5..928aa45 100644
> --- a/Monitor.c
> +++ b/Monitor.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int check_array(struct state *st, struct mdstat_ent *mdstat,
> alert("NewArray", st->devname, NULL, ainfo);
> }
>
> - if (st->utime == array.utime &&
> + if (st->utime == (long)array.utime &&
> st->failed == array.failed_disks &&
> st->working == array.working_disks &&
> st->spare == array.spare_disks &&
Hi Xiao,
Thanks for the patch - I think the correct fix in Monitor.c is to change
utime in struct state from long to unsigned int, to match the change
Deepa Dinamani introduced in 26714713cd2bad9e0bf7f4669f6cc4659ceaab6c
utime is only ever derived from mdu_array_info_s, so it should be safe.
> diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
> index 970d484..ccbb2bc 100644
> --- a/util.c
> +++ b/util.c
> @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ struct supertype *guess_super_type(int fd, enum guess_types guess_type)
> struct mdinfo info;
> st->ss->getinfo_super(st, &info, NULL);
> if (bestsuper == -1 ||
> - besttime < info.array.ctime) {
> + besttime < (time_t)info.array.ctime) {
> bestsuper = i;
> besttime = info.array.ctime;
> }
Here I think we should change the declaration of besttime from time_t to
unsigned int, again to match the definition used in mdu_array_info_s.
That or we should change mdu_array_info_s to use time_t instead, but I
am not sure that would be safe.
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
