page->index already considers node offset. The node_offset calculation
in write_sb_page is useless and confusion.
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/bitmap.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
index 4f22e91..d80cce4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
@@ -210,10 +210,6 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
struct block_device *bdev;
struct mddev *mddev = bitmap->mddev;
struct bitmap_storage *store = &bitmap->storage;
- int node_offset = 0;
-
- if (mddev_is_clustered(bitmap->mddev))
- node_offset = bitmap->cluster_slot * store->file_pages;
while ((rdev = next_active_rdev(rdev, mddev)) != NULL) {
int size = PAGE_SIZE;
--
2.4.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
