Re: RAID10 Write Performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 23 2015, Marc Smith wrote:

> Solved... appears it was the write-intent bitmap that caused the
> performance issues. I discovered if I left the test running longer
> than 60 seconds, the performance would eventually climb to where I'd
> expect it. I ran 'mdadm --grow --bitmap=none /dev/md0' and now random
> write performance is high/good/stable right off the bat.

Keeping a write-intent bitmap really is a good idea.
Using a larger bitmap chunk size can reduce the performance penalty and
preserve much of the value.  It is easy enough to experiment with
different sizes.

NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux