On Tue, Nov 10 2015, d4lamar wrote: > 2015-11-10 5:26 GMT+01:00 Anugraha Sinha <asinha.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi, >> >> Could you share your kernel version and mdadm package version, please? > > Of course. > > 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.lustre.4033.x86_64 This is a Redhat kernel based on a very old mainline kernel. You are experiencing a kernel bug (which seems vaguely familiar by I don't recall the details). To get support for a Redhat kernel, you need to talk to Redhat. If you want help here, you need to be running a kernel must closer to current mainline. It doesn't have to be the very latest, but something released in the last year would be best. NeilBrown > mdadm-3.2.2-9.xrtx.5.x86_64 > > Thanks, > d4lamar > >> On 11/10/2015 1:13 PM, d4lamar wrote: >>> >>> Dear Developers, >>> >>> I am here again to ask you support about RESYNC operation. >>> In my first mail I asked if there were any method to stop a running >>> RESYNC. >>> >>> Now I am experiencing a very strange behaviour... RESYNC operation >>> exceeded 100% completion percentage... >>> >>> # cat /proc/mdstat >>> Tue Nov 10 05:02:41 CET 2015 >>> Personalities : [raid1] [raid10] [linear] >>> md66 : active linear md0[0] >>> 2939452080 blocks super 1.2 4k rounding >>> >>> md0 : active raid10 sdab[17](S) sdt[16](S) sdaj[0] sdx[12] sdai[11] >>> sdah[9] sdam[15] sdae[7] sdas[6] sdaa[5] sdap[4] sdao[3] sdaf[14] >>> sdz[1] >>> 2939453104 blocks super 1.2 4K chunks 2 near-copies [14/12] >>> [UUUUUUUUUU_UU_] >>> [=========================>] resync =129.9% (545894292/419921872) >>> finish=20192933978332.0min speed=7612K/sec >>> bitmap: 22/22 pages [88KB], 65536KB chunk >>> >>> md65 : active raid1 sdal[0] sdar[1] >>> 419921875 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] >>> bitmap: 0/4 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk >>> >>> unused devices: <none> >>> >>> Are you aware of such possible behaviour ? Do you think I have just hit a >>> BUG ? >>> >>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>> d4lamar >>> >>> 2015-11-06 7:44 GMT+01:00 d4lamar <d4lamar@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> >>>> Dear Developers, >>>> >>>> I have a question for you. >>>> >>>> I have a raid10 md array: >>>> >>>> Is it theoretically possible to stop a running resync operation and >>>> mark the array as clean without stopping the array ? >>>> >>>> I do not want the resync to be respawned automatically. >>>> >>>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>>> d4lamar >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
