From: Dan Williams <djbw@xxxxxx>
Let bare devices that fit the domain become raid members. Rather than
require the tracking of 'failed slots', simply define a group of slots
for the domain and let any bare devices attached in those domains join
a compatible array.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
---
policy.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/policy.c b/policy.c
index 960a37e..6afafad 100644
--- a/policy.c
+++ b/policy.c
@@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ int write_rule(struct rule *rule, int fd, int force_part)
/* Generate single entry in udev rule basing on POLICY line found in config
* file. Take only those with paths, only first occurrence if paths are equal
- * and if actions supports handling of spares (>=act_spare_same_slot)
+ * and if actions supports handling of spares (>=act_spare)
*/
int generate_entries(int fd)
{
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ int generate_entries(int fd)
/* only policies with paths and with actions supporting
* bare disks are considered */
loop_value = find_rule(loop->rule, pol_act);
- if (!loop_value || map_act(loop_value) < act_spare_same_slot)
+ if (!loop_value || map_act(loop_value) < act_spare)
continue;
rule = find_path_rule(loop->rule);
if (!rule)
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ int generate_entries(int fd)
if (dup->type != rule_policy && loop->type != rule_part)
continue;
dup_value = find_rule(dup->rule, pol_act);
- if (!dup_value || map_act(dup_value) < act_spare_same_slot)
+ if (!dup_value || map_act(dup_value) < act_spare)
continue;
rule = find_path_rule(dup->rule);
if (!rule)
--
2.4.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
