Re: broken raid level 5 array caused by user error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/10/2015 06:59 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
>>> For now, use data offset 2048 for all of them.
>>
>> output of all eight combinations:
> 
> Hmmm.  Very strange.  Let's see the dump of the start of the data area of all four partitions:
> 
> for x in /dev/sd[efgh]1 ; do echo -e "\n$x\n" ; dd if=$x skip=2048 count=16 2>/dev/null |hexdump -C ; done

I just noticed your response to this didn't make it to the list.  It was
108k.  If you do it again with count=8 -- that'll be enough for everyone
to understand my other reply.

Phil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux