On Mon, Nov 02 2015, Roman Gushchin wrote: > The stripe_add_to_batch_list() function is called only if > stripe_can_batch() returned true, so there is no need for double check. > > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c > index 45933c1..f829ebc 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c > @@ -768,8 +768,6 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh > int hash; > int dd_idx; > > - if (!stripe_can_batch(sh)) > - return; > /* Don't cross chunks, so stripe pd_idx/qd_idx is the same */ > tmp_sec = sh->sector; > if (!sector_div(tmp_sec, conf->chunk_sectors)) > -- > 2.4.3 applied, thanks. (for future reference, public mailing lists like linux-raid aren't usually mentioned on a 'Cc:' line in a patch. Documentation/SubmittingPatches suggests: If a person has had the opportunity to comment on a patch, but has not provided such comments, you may optionally add a "Cc:" tag to the patch. This is the only tag which might be added without an explicit action by the person it names - but it should indicate that this person was copied on the patch. This tag documents that potentially interested parties have been included in the discussion. so it is primarily for third-party individuals ) Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
