Re: raid1 - mismatches after resuming interrupted recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I've found that if I interrupt a recovery by removing the target
> device, do IO before the recovery checkpoint, then re-add the device
> and let the recovery complete, the mismatch_cnt is non-zero after
> doing a check.

Neil,

While I am on the nagging path, here is another one.

Jes

> Here's exactly what I'm doing:
>
> - create a 5 GB raid1 with internal bitmap
>
> - do a check, verify zero mismatch_cnt
>
> - remove one member device
>
> - dd 256MB with 2GB seek
>
> - lower sync_speed_min/max to 500
>
> - re-add removed device
>
> - wait 15 sec
>
> - remove the same member device again
>
> - dd 1MB with 1 GB seek
>
> - restore sync_speed_min/max to system defaults
>
> - re-add removed device
>
> - when recovery competes, do another check
>
> At this point the mismatch_cnt is non-zero.
>
>
> I originally hit this on RHEL 7.1, but tested 4.1.1 from kernel.org
> and it happens there too.
>
> I'm out of my league in terms of trying to fix this, but would be
> happy to test a fix. I wonder if it's really necessary to resume a
> bitmap recovery from the checkpoint? Wouldn't the bitmap always
> reflect what needs to be copied?
>
> Nate
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux