Re: kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rainer Fügenstein <rfu@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> my  NAS-like  server with 5*3TB SATA drives in RAID5 configuration was
> running  without  problems  for  what seems an eternity; since about 3
> weeks it keeps freezing every other day with the following error:
>
> # grep soft /var/log/messages
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff80012583>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x133
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:26:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8006d63a>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff80012583>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x133
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:27:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8006d63a>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 60s! [md0_raid5:1614]
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff80012583>] __do_softirq+0x51/0x133
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8005e298>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
> Oct 15 11:28:49 alfred kernel:  [<ffffffff8006d63a>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
> [...]
> this  is  only  part  of  the story, check the end of this message for
> a detailed log.
>
> sometimes the server recovers after 60+ seconds, sometimes it requires
> a hard reset (causing mdraid to re-sync the whole array).

I strongly recommend adding a write-intend bitmap
  mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap=internal

that will speed up the resync enormously.

>
> IIRC,  it  started  when  a  drive  in  the  array  failed  with "SATA
> connection  timeouts" (kind of). this drive has been replaced by a new
> one, but yet the  CPU lockups keep coming.
>
> I  suspect  that  aging  hardware  slowly starts to fail, but not sure
> which part (drives? SATA controller? cables? NIC? CPU? ...)
>
> here's some info that might be useful:
> # uname -a
> Linux alfred 2.6.18-406.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jun 2 17:25:57 EDT 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

This is a rather ancient kernel.
The "el" suffix probably suggests Redhat?  If you have a Redhat support
contract you should ask them.  If you don't, you should probably try a
newer kernel (or buy a support contract).

NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux