On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Chris <email.bug@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thank you for the additional information, it calls for action. > > > OK, calling for a solution to stop desktop drives from causing data loss and > affecting the mdadm reputation: > > > I gather that mdadm could ship with one additional udev rule that calls a > script to check/set scterc, or falls back to increasing the system timout. > > Phil, you mentioned having posted such a script, could you prepare it for > addition to the mdadm package? > > > Would maintainers be ok with adding such a udev rule and script to the package? "maintainers" ? Plural? That would be nice. Unfortunately there is just the one singular me.... There are certainly other contributors who - answer questions on the list - provide bug reports - provide bits of code and I am very thankful to them. But I haven't found a likely co-maintainer yet :-( I'm certainly happy to consider and concrete proposal. The more concrete, the better. NeilBrown
Attachment:
pgp3BdpZuQ9Ty.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
