Hi Roman, On 02/07/2015 06:04 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 09:39:47 +1100 > Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I looked up the size of the different parts of the RAID to arrive at that conclusion. Dumping the sectors >> around the bad area also showed it to be all zeroes. > > I wouldn't expect mdadm to have any headers or unused areas as far as 133 MB > into a RAID member. Look at mdadm -E for that drive and your partition start sector. I bet Eyal is right. Latest mdadm gives me a 128MB data offset. Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
