Re: [PATCH] md: do_release_stripe(): No need to call md_wakeup_thread() twice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:38:29 -0500 Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 67f455486d2ea20b2d94d6adf5b9b783d079e321 introduced a call to
> md_wakeup_thread() when adding to the delayed_list. However the md
> thread is woken up unconditionally just below.
> 
> Remove the unnecessary wakeup call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index c1b0d52..41494d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -296,12 +296,9 @@ static void do_release_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh,
>  	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes)==0);
>  	if (test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state)) {
>  		if (test_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state) &&
> -		    !test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) {
> +		    !test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
>  			list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->delayed_list);
> -			if (atomic_read(&conf->preread_active_stripes)
> -			    < IO_THRESHOLD)
> -				md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
> -		} else if (test_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state) &&
> +		else if (test_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state) &&
>  			   sh->bm_seq - conf->seq_write > 0)
>  			list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->bitmap_list);
>  		else {

Applied, thanks.

NeilBrown

Attachment: pgpxascwuE5Zm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux