Re: [PATCH 5/8 v2] dm: replace memset by memzero_explicit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 01 2014 at  4:03pm -0500,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/30/2014 06:03 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Memset on a local variable may be removed when it is called just before the
> > variable goes out of scope.  Using memzero_explicit defeats this
> > optimization.  A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this
> > change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> Ack, but I submitted the same patch a week ago....
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-November/msg00084.html
> 
> Mike, please could you add this to linux-next tree or you want this
> to go through Herbert's tree?
> (I do not think it is good idea for DM patches.)

I staged it in linux-next for 3.19 inclusion, see:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-for-3.19&id=a722201f9075b28be140bc13f8ec07bf6a42edd4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux