Re: Multiple drive failure after stupid mistake. Help needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes! It works! Thanks so much. Lets hope the sdc drive survives the rebuild this time. At least I got the opportunity to backup the 24GB important (not backed up data).

The Linux raid usually works so well that you never have to worry. And when things go wrong
you therefor never have the experience to help fix the problem.

Thanks again!

Best regards

Per-Ola Stenborg


Mikael Abrahamsson skrev 2014-10-19 19:06:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Per-Ola Stenborg wrote:

I compiled the latest mdadm v3.3.2 - 21st August 2014
running
mdadm --assemble --force /dev/md0 /dev/sd[bcde]
outputs
mdadm: /dev/sdb is busy - skipping
mdadm: /dev/sdc is busy - skipping
mdadm: /dev/sdd is busy - skipping
mdadm: /dev/sde is busy - skipping

Strange. What does this mean? Is it flaged as in use in the kernel? The

Stop the array before you try to start it again.

Also consider upgrading to a newer kernel if there is a backports one (there should be for debian squeeze), a lot of things have happened since 2.6.32.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux