On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Chao Yu wrote:
> printk may cause long time lapse if value of printk_delay in sysctl is
> configured large by user. If register_md_personality takes long time to print in
> spinlock pers_lock, we may encounter high CPU usage rate when there are other
> pers_lock competitors who may be blocked to spin.
> We can avoid this condition by moving printk out of coverage of pers_lock
> spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/md.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index e02de05..5fcf215 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -7200,9 +7200,10 @@ static const struct file_operations md_seq_fops = {
>
> int register_md_personality(struct md_personality *p)
> {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s personality registered for level %d\n",
> + p->name, p->level);
> spin_lock(&pers_lock);
> list_add_tail(&p->list, &pers_list);
> - printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s personality registered for level %d\n", p->name, p->level);
> spin_unlock(&pers_lock);
> return 0;
> }
Wouldn't it make more sense to move the printk after the spin_unlock ?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
