On 30/07/2014 13:13, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
There has been much discussion about the URE figures. Some people
interpret it one way, others another way. There is nobody here that
knows for sure. Ask your HDD vendor, if they answer, do share here!
- Ouch! -
I was hoping that HDD vendors were somewhat more open about their URE
calculations... It's time for some lab test, I think!
>
When MD encounters an URE, it should calculate that block from parity
information and write it. I have personally had problems with this not
happening, seems it might be that if the URE doesn't happen repeatedly,
MD might not re-write. All parity raid levels should behave the same, so
this should work identically for RAID1, RAID10, RAID5 and RAID6.
What about _degraded_ array state? In other words, if a degraded RAID5
experiences a URE during rebuild, what happens? I read that most
hardware based RAID card both stop rebuilding _and_ kill the entire
array. From my understanding, mdadm should stop rebuilding but the array
can the restarted, mounted and backupped. Right?
Regards.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
