RE: [PATCH] IMSM: move "validate_container_imsm" to be included in mdassemble

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Monday, July 21, 2014 9:48 AM Samuli Suominen [mailto:ssuominen@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> To: NeilBrown; Baldysiak, Pawel
> Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paszkiewicz, Artur
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IMSM: move "validate_container_imsm" to be included
> in mdassemble
> 
> 
> On 21/07/14 09:57, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:01:27 +0200 Pawel Baldysiak
> > <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Commit 0c21b485e4beb7bcfe631412a231f7c1ea1067bc added new
> function in
> >> imsm superswitch. This function should be included in mdassemble.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  super-intel.c |   82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> --------
> >>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/super-intel.c b/super-intel.c index b4efa72..e28ac7d
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/super-intel.c
> >> +++ b/super-intel.c
> >> @@ -9048,6 +9048,47 @@ int open_backup_targets(struct mdinfo *info,
> int raid_disks, int *raid_fds,
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>
> +/*********************************************************
> **********************
> >> + * Function:	validate_container_imsm
> >> + * Description: This routine validates container after assemble,
> >> + *		eg. if devices in container are under the same controller.
> >> + *
> >> + * Parameters:
> >> + *	info	: linked list with info about devices used in array
> >> + * Returns:
> >> + *	1 : HBA mismatch
> >> + *	0 : Success
> >> +
> >>
> +*********************************************************
> ***********
> >> +**********/ int validate_container_imsm(struct mdinfo *info) {
> >> +	if (!check_env("IMSM_NO_PLATFORM")) {
> >> +		struct sys_dev *idev;
> >> +		struct mdinfo *dev;
> >> +		char *hba_path = NULL;
> >> +		char *dev_path = devt_to_devpath(makedev(info-
> >disk.major,
> >> +
> 	info->disk.minor));
> >> +
> >> +		for (idev = find_intel_devices(); idev; idev = idev->next) {
> >> +			if (strstr(dev_path, idev->path)) {
> >> +				hba_path = idev->path;
> >> +				break;
> >> +			}
> >> +		}
> >> +		free(dev_path);
> >> +
> >> +		if (hba_path) {
> >> +			for (dev = info->next; dev; dev = dev->next) {
> >> +				if (!devt_attached_to_hba(makedev(dev-
> >disk.major,
> >> +						dev->disk.minor), hba_path))
> {
> >> +					pr_err("WARNING - IMSM container
> assembled with disks under different HBAs!\n"
> >> +						"       This operation is not
> supported and can lead to data loss.\n");
> >> +					return 1;
> >> +				}
> >> +			}
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >>  #ifndef MDASSEMBLE
> >>
> /**********************************************************
> *********************
> >>   * Function:	init_migr_record_imsm
> >> @@ -10524,47 +10565,6 @@ abort:
> >>  	return ret_val;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -
> /**********************************************************
> *********************
> >> - * Function:	validate_container_imsm
> >> - * Description: This routine validates container after assemble,
> >> - *		eg. if devices in container are under the same controller.
> >> - *
> >> - * Parameters:
> >> - *	info	: linked list with info about devices used in array
> >> - * Returns:
> >> - *	1 : HBA mismatch
> >> - *	0 : Success
> >> -
> >>
> **********************************************************
> ***********
> >> *********/ -int validate_container_imsm(struct mdinfo *info) -{
> >> -	if (!check_env("IMSM_NO_PLATFORM")) {
> >> -		struct sys_dev *idev;
> >> -		struct mdinfo *dev;
> >> -		char *hba_path = NULL;
> >> -		char *dev_path = devt_to_devpath(makedev(info-
> >disk.major,
> >> -
> 	info->disk.minor));
> >> -
> >> -		for (idev = find_intel_devices(); idev; idev = idev->next) {
> >> -			if (strstr(dev_path, idev->path)) {
> >> -				hba_path = idev->path;
> >> -				break;
> >> -			}
> >> -		}
> >> -		free(dev_path);
> >> -
> >> -		if (hba_path) {
> >> -			for (dev = info->next; dev; dev = dev->next) {
> >> -				if (!devt_attached_to_hba(makedev(dev-
> >disk.major,
> >> -						dev->disk.minor), hba_path))
> {
> >> -					pr_err("WARNING - IMSM container
> assembled with disks under different HBAs!\n"
> >> -						"       This operation is not
> supported and can lead to data loss.\n");
> >> -					return 1;
> >> -				}
> >> -			}
> >> -		}
> >> -	}
> >> -	return 0;
> >> -}
> >>  #endif /* MDASSEMBLE */
> >>
> >>  struct superswitch super_imsm = {
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > Though I do wonder if we really need mdassemble.  Is there a
> > convincing use-case?
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> 
> This is why we are packaging mdassemble in Gentoo's sys-fs/mdadm
> package:
> 
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211426
> 
> Quoting from the bug:
> 
> "mdassemble is a lightweight program to assemble raid devices that can be
> called directly for an initramfs filesystem. It weights 88ko compiled statically
> with dietlibc."
> 
> So the use case seems to be initramfs, embedded, minimal systems
> 
> - Samuli

Hi

Intel does not support mdassemble.
Above fix  was created only to avoid compilation errors.

Thanks
Pawel Baldysiak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux