Anyone able to provide some insight please? On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:08 PM, George Duffield <forumscollective@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I recently created a raid 5 array under Arch Linux running on a HP > Microserver using pretty much the same topography as I do under Ubuntu > Server. The creation process went fine and the array is accessible, > however, from the outset it's only ever reported status as Active > rather than Clean. > > After creating the array, watch -d cat /proc/mdstat returned: > > Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdc1[2] sde1[5] sdb1[1] sdd1[3] > 11720536064 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 > [5/5] [UUUUU] > bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk > > unused devices: <none> > > which to me pretty much looks like the array sync completed successfully. > > I then updated the config file, assembled the array and formatted it using: > mdadm --detail --scan >> /etc/mdadm.conf > mdadm --assemble --scan > mkfs.ext4 -v -L offsitestorage -b 4096 -E stride=128,stripe-width=512 /dev/md0 > > mdadm --detail /dev/md0 returns: > > /dev/md0: > Version : 1.2 > Creation Time : Thu Apr 17 01:13:52 2014 > Raid Level : raid5 > Array Size : 11720536064 (11177.57 GiB 12001.83 GB) > Used Dev Size : 2930134016 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB) > Raid Devices : 5 > Total Devices : 5 > Persistence : Superblock is persistent > > Intent Bitmap : Internal > > Update Time : Thu Apr 17 18:55:01 2014 > State : active > Active Devices : 5 > Working Devices : 5 > Failed Devices : 0 > Spare Devices : 0 > > Layout : left-symmetric > Chunk Size : 512K > > Name : audioliboffsite:0 (local to host audioliboffsite) > UUID : aba348c6:8dc7b4a7:4e282ab5:40431aff > Events : 11306 > > Number Major Minor RaidDevice State > 0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1 > 1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1 > 2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1 > 3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1 > 5 8 65 4 active sync /dev/sde1 > > So, I'm now left wondering why the state of the array isn't "clean"? > Is it normal for arrays to show a state of "active" instead of clean > under Arch - is it simply a matter of Arch is packaged with a more > recent version of mdadm than Ubuntu Server? > > Thx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
