Re: Array created by mdadm 3.2 & 3.3 have different array size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/26/2014 9:44 PM, Tide wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner <stan <at> hardwarefreak.com> writes:
>>
>> On 3/26/2014 3:00 PM, Tide wrote:
>> ...
>>> =================
>>> Array 2 (RAID 6):
>>> =================
>>> # mdadm --examine /dev/sdb1
>> ...
>>>      Raid Level : raid6
>>>    Raid Devices : 5
>> ...
>>>   Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset 72 sectors
>>
>> The RAID6 array has sectors on each drive reserved for bad block
>> reassignment.  The RAID5 array does not.
>>
>> This is the answer to your mystery.


> "The RAID6/RAID5 array", do you mean my RAID array (just this instance), or
> you mean "all RAID6/RAID5 arrays created by mdadm" ?

My reply above is unambiguous.  I quoted your array data and gave an
answer that applies to your provided array data.

WRT your other questions, I do not have time to research the answer to
those, and wouldn't spend it on that if I did.  I have never used CentOS
nor Fedora, and don't plan to ever use either.  For those answers,
either wait for someone to answer, or research it yourself.

Cheers,

Stan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux