Re: AW: raid 'check' does not provoke expected i/o error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern) wrote:

In short: smartctl lists one pending sector. A dd of that disk provokes an i/o error
as expected. A raid 'sync_action=check' does not find a problem and does *not* trigger
an i/o error. Why?

Hello Eyal
Why not using ddrescue (or dd_rescue) instead (errorprone).

Probably because he wants to have the pending sector recalculated from parity and written to with correct data.

Eyal, I had the same problem. I have reported this in the thread named "Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6". The problem wasn't found then and I have since worked around the problem by doing a want-replace of the bad drive, so good you too reported this. Perhaps the problem can be found and corrected now that I am not the only one reporting this behavior.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux