Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:40:32 +0800 Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
	return batch_size;
> > 
> > I think this could possibly return with ->working still 'true'.
> > I think it is safest to clear it on every exit from the function
> 
> Ok, this one doesn't matter too, I fixed it.
>  
> Subject:raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
> 
> If there are no enough stripes to handle, we'd better not always queue all
> available work_structs. If one worker can only handle small or even none
> stripes, it will impact request merge and create lock contention.
> 
> With this patch, the number of work_struct running will depend on pending
> stripes number. Note: some statistics info used in the patch are accessed without
> locking protection. This should doesn't matter, we just try best to avoid queue
> unnecessary work_struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.
I removed the 'working_cnt' field as it wasn't being used, and have applied
and push out the patch.

NeilBrown


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux