Re: mdraid autodetect partially failing after disk replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 8, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Ricky Burgin <ricky@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello again,
> 
> Little bit of progress since I last dropped a message in (sorry for the
> duplicate, didn't think the initial one got through).
> 
> The kernel has mdraid built into it and all disks are using 0.90
> superblocks, all 'fd' partitions, but only 2 or 4 disks are being
> recognised and applied to the freshly created raid array which works
> fine when mounted on any other OS.
> 
> Any suggestions for what could cause disks to be overlooked by mdraid
> before the root device is even attempted to be mounted would be very
> helpful, I'm now totally at a loss as to what to do from here.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Ricky Burgin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Is it possible that you still have 1.x superblocks on two drives that are being detected before the 0.9 superblocks on this OS?  I don't know if this is or is not possible, but that is the only strangeness I see from your prior posts etc.

You should probably boot that version of CentOS's rescue mode and see if you have the same issues there... 

Sam--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux