On 05/03/2013 08:26 AM, Ole Tange wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Andreas Boman<aboman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This morning I came up to see the array degraded with two missing drives,
another failed during the rebuild.
I just started this page for dealing with situations like yours:
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Recovering_a_failed_software_RAID
/Ole
Thanks Ole, that is a great resource. Thanks to everybody else who
offered advise as well. I'll be getting new disks coming in today and
will try to recover.
I didn't mean to set of a contentious debate about default behavior of
mdadm. However having an option where mdadm can 'try harder' to complete
would be a good thing. It should probably remain an option to prevent
further beating on the disk and thus further data loss for those that
would prefer to remove the disk and clone it before trying to restore.
/Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
