Re: RAID 5 doesn't scale

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> On 04/03/2013 03:18 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> 
> > You didn't mention your stripe_cache_size value.  It'll make a lot of
> > difference.  Make sure it's at least 4096.  The default is 256.
> 
> I'm not getting it - why would stripe cache size matter in a random
> read/write test? If the disks are large enough and the pattern is really
> random, the cache should hardly ever be hit (s_c_z = 4096 =^ 16MB cache
> per disk, that's 0.01% of disk size for a 160GB SSD).
> 
> I read that Peter confirmed the influence of stripe_cache_size, but I'd
> like to understand why it matters in this case.
> 
> Martin


I'm very sorry but now i can't confirm anymore that stripe_cache_size helps.

My test was to short. With every minute the IOPS decrease. So 
stripe_cache_size does only help for very short tests. 

I will provide details in another post.

Peter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux