On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:59:30 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Dan Williams <djbw@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a > >> while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the > >> Linux kernel summit, remove it from any "depends on" lines in Kconfigs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/md/Kconfig | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/md/Kconfig b/drivers/md/Kconfig > >> index 7cdf359..0cc3a3d 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/md/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/md/Kconfig > >> @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ config MULTICORE_RAID456 > >> bool "RAID-4/RAID-5/RAID-6 Multicore processing (EXPERIMENTAL)" > >> depends on MD_RAID456 > >> depends on SMP > >> - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > > > > In this case MULTICORE_RAID456 and the related code should go as > > well... now that there are patches to supersede this implementation in > > md-next. > > Can my original patch go through as-is for Linus's tree? Right now, > this is the last use of EXPERIMENTAL in v3.9-rc1. If we can drop it, > we can remove the config item entirely from v3.9. My pull request which removes CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456 completely was a little late and missed -rc1. Hopefully it will appear soon. But if it isn't gone by -rc2, I have no objection to your patch going in then. NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
