On 3/2/2013 11:07 AM, Phil Turmel wrote: > On 03/02/2013 04:15 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> On 3/1/2013 10:06 AM, Adam Goryachev wrote: ... >>> Is it worth reducing the chunk size from 64k down to 16k or even smaller? >> >> 64KB chunks should be fine here. Any gains with a smaller chunk would >> be small, and would pale in comparison to the amount of PITA required to >> redo the array and everything currently sitting atop it. Remember you'd >> have to destroy it and start over. You can't change chunk size of an >> existing array. > > Actually, you can. For levels 0 and 4,5,6. First, I'll reiterate that a smaller chunk size likely is not going to yield real workload gains for Adam. And it obviously would decrease his FIO numbers, making him think performance decreased, even if it actually increased slightly with his real workload. Speaking strictly now from a knowledge transfer standpoint, does this chunk size change feature go back a ways or does it require a fairly recent kernel and/or mdadm? Are there any prerequisites or special considerations different from any other reshape operation? -- Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
