Am 27.02.2013 20:33, schrieb Hans-Peter Jansen:
Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013, 20:04:41 schrieb Stone:
sorry :-)
the last night was very short...
know i have tested case #2
for x in /dev/sd[efh] ; do parted $x unit s print ; done
Model: ATA WDC WD20EARS-00M (scsi)
Disk /dev/sde: 3907029168s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 34s 3907029118s 3907029085s raid
Model: ATA WDC WD20EARS-00M (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdf: 3907029168s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 2048s 3907029118s 3907027071s prmiary
Model: ATA WDC WD20EARS-00M (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdh: 3907029168s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 34s 3907029118s 3907029085s raid
Your whole partitioning looks garbled. /dev/sdf1 starts at 2048, while the
others start at 34 (even 34 is a strange value), but all end on the same
sector, sdf carries no raid flag, but primary (with a funny letter swap - my
parted gets this word right, at least).
I would compare the first sectors of these devices (especially around sector
34). Probably you managed to destroy your former partition table on sdf, e.g.
try to adjust this one similar to the others.
Cheers,
Pete
i also have set all drives to start with sector 34 and then i started a
fsck -y but the output was the same...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
