Re: Usefulness of RAID 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/19/2013 4:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 2/18/2013 9:01 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> Assuming HDD only, is there broad use case for RAID 4 that RAID 5 isn't equally or better suited for?
>>>
>>> What about making the parity drive an SSD, keeping the other drives HDD?
>>
>> Why are you revisiting RAID-4?
> 
> Because it's offered in Fedora 18's GUI installer.
> 
>>  It's dead tech, decades ago.  It has no
>> advantages over subsequent RAID levels, yet significant handicap.
> 
> That's what I thought. But is it remotely practical/useful to use HDDs for data drives, and one SSD as the parity drive to eliminate the parity write bottleneck of RAID 4?

Lines from the 1990 submarine warfare film "Hunt for Red October" are
applicable here:

Ryan:  "Could you launch an ICBM horizontally?"
Tyler: "I guess you could, but why would you want to?"

-- 
Stan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux