Re: problems formatting raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/02/2013 9:15 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
that's like BASE jumping with a large umbrella, as earlier noted.
Don't do that, it'll just hurt you. At least use RAID-5 and preferably
use more RAID sets and RAID-0 or LVM on top.

Make that RAID-6

I agree. I think a more sane outlook on this would be 19 drives made up of:
	* RAID Level: 6
	* Hot Spares: 2

Using RAID5 then its not a matter of if you are going to lose your array, its a matter of WHEN considering the number of spindles here.

If you have the drives in separate enclosures or different controllers, have one spare per controller - ie don't but both spares on the same controller.

*Maybe* if you are pushed for space, only use 1 hot spare - but be sure to have a drive sat in the anti-static bag on a shelf within walking distance of the server.

--
Steven Haigh

Email: netwiz@xxxxxxxxx
Web: https://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux