Re: RAID performance - *Slow SSDs likely solved*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/7/2013 4:05 AM, Adam Goryachev wrote:

> Storage server:
...
> 5 x Intel 520s MLC 480G SATA3
> Debian Stable .. *kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64*

There was a regression in 2.6.32 kernels that hammered SSD performance.
 Upgrade to linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 and it should fix it.  See:

http://www.archivum.info/linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/2010-02/00243/bad-performance-with-SSD-since-kernel-version-2.6.32.html

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642729

It was reverted in 2.6.33 upstream, and supposedly reverted in 2.6.32
upstream stable.  But apparently, according to Ben Hutchings last
comment in the Debian bug report, it hasn't been fixed yet in Debian
2.6.32, and that was over a year ago.

BTW, did you get the LSI card into the server yet, and if so have you
run any FIO tests to compare with the previous onboard SATA2 numbers you
posted?  Would be interesting to see what performance advantage, if any,
it has over the onboard SATA2, and would also allow us to see just how
much difference the new kernel makes.

Also, which LSI board did you get, the 9211 or 9307?  You simply said
you got the "recommended" one, or something like that.

-- 
Stan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux