11.02.2013 14:11, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 11.02.2013 09:33, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
11.02.2013 04:20, NeilBrown wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:48:38 +0100 Thomas Bächler
<thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-IMPORT{program}="/sbin/blkid -o udev -p $tempnode"
+IMPORT{builtin}="blkid"
Does this has additional udev version constrain?
I mean, which is the minimum udev version to support this properly,
do we care?
Udev relies on devtmpfs and thus does not create devices since version
176, therefore $tempnode is deprecated and only $devnode should be used
($tempnode seems to be around for compatibility, no idea if/when it will
be dropped).
The blkid builtin is also available since udev 176. In latest
util-linux, the 'blkid -o udev' output is marked as deprecated, although
Karel says it's not entirely going away for now.
Thank you for the explanation.
Why do we care? We want correct udev rules ($tempnode vs. $devnode), and
the using builtin is faster and less error-prone than calling an
external tool (plus, it is used everywhere else in udev).
As for compatibility: I see no reason why anyone would use a version of
udev that is more than one year old (175) together with a mdadm version
that is to be released in the future (3.2.7). If someone really wants
that, they should be competent enough to adjust the udev rules for their
local build.
Well, it was just a question. Think about a distribution which is being
upgraded from one release to another, -- inter-package versioned dependencies
should be set correctly, so that the system will not be broken by upgrading
mdadm which relies on udev, but not upgrading udev. It's a good idea to
note somewhere that the next release of mdadm will require at least udev
175. That's about it.
Thank you!
/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
