Re: RAID performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/02/13 00:03, Phil Turmel wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 07:58 AM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
>> On 07/02/13 23:53, Phil Turmel wrote:
>>> On 02/07/2013 07:49 AM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
>>>> Well, if I can re-trim daily, and have enough clean space to work for 2
>>>> days, then I should never hit this problem.... Assuming it loses *that
>>>> much* performance....
> 
> You just have nothing useful on the server side for trim to do.
> (Although you should manually trim the unpartitioned space.  You only
> need to do so once.)

If the unpartitioned space has *never* been used/partitioned, then I
presume TRIM wouldn't help here then.... So, I guess I might as well
leave this one alone.

Though, like I said, would adding an extra SSD to the RAID5, and
reducing the size of all partitions by 20%, and then doing TRIM on that
newly freed space, would that improve performance because of the extra
free space the SSD can "work with" ?

Thanks again,
Adam

-- 
Adam Goryachev
Website Managers
www.websitemanagers.com.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux