Re: RAID performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

On 02/07/2013 11:12 AM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> Do you have any information on what your workload is, or how/why these
> values might help?

Most of our data servers are exporting data read-only via NFS. It helped
well on these but more on download servers which allowed us to go from
200k 4MB downloads per day to 1M/day while adding new files constantly.

> 
> You are changing values significantly from the default, and I am
> cautious that they may cause other issues. Also, someone else has
> advised to reduce nr_requests rather than increasing it?
> 

I know, but these larger queues really helped a lot in re-ordering
requests to better match the hardware underneath - but again, this was
for hard drives with physical arms and not SSDs

Cheers

Carsten

-- 
Dr. Carsten Aulbert - Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics
Callinstrasse 38, 30167 Hannover, Germany
phone/fax: +49 511 762-17185 / -17193
https://wiki.atlas.aei.uni-hannover.de/foswiki/bin/view/ATLAS/WebHome
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux