Re: What layout with 6x2TB, Intel Atom?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4 February 2013 20:27, Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've an Intel Atom 330 running 32-bit Ubuntu, ~3.5GB RAM. The intent
> is to store large media files (>4GB) for streaming by maximum 3
> clients at any time. Very read heavy.
> 6x 2TB HDDs are available, the crux is that 3 HDDs are on the on-board
> SATA controller, the other 3 are on a Marvel PCI-E adapter
>
> cat /proc/mdstat
>
> Personalities : [raid10]
> md125 : active raid10 sdg[1] sdf[0]
>       1953382400 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 far-copies [2/2] [UU]
>       [>....................]  resync =  1.1% (22074880/1953382400)
> finish=642.2min speed=50114K/sec
>
> md126 : active raid10 sde[1] sdd[0]
>       1953382400 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 far-copies [2/2] [UU]
>       [>....................]  resync =  1.6% (31473408/1953382400)
> finish=398.6min speed=80354K/sec
>
> md127 : active raid10 sdc[1] sdb[0]
>       1953382400 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 far-copies [2/2] [UU]
>       [>....................]  resync =  1.1% (22630912/1953382400)
> finish=617.9min speed=52073K/sec
>
> unused devices: <none>
>
> create commands:
>   105  sudo mdadm --verbose --create md0 --level=10 --layout=f2
> --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
>   106  sudo mdadm --verbose --create md1 --level=10 --layout=f2
> --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdd /dev/sde
>   107  sudo mdadm --verbose --create md2 --level=10 --layout=f2
> --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdf /dev/sdg
>   111  sudo mdadm --verbose --create md3 --level=10 --layout=f2
> --raid-devices=3 /dev/md/md0 /dev/md/md1 /dev/md/md2
>   118  sudo mdadm --stop /dev/md124 # to stop seek of death until the
> above finishes resyncing
>
> I read that the far layout gives faster read performance compared to
> standard RAID1 in a 2 HDD array, so that's why I used it. I then
> created yet another RAID10 f2 layout of the 3x 2 disk RAID10 volumes,
> giving me /dev/md124. Filesystem doesn't matter, I need something
> that's stable with good performance over the RAID set.
> I just realized that out of 12 TB raw space I now only have 3TB
> available, heh. So I suppose I'm going for a different layout.
>
> Any opinions?
>
> Cheers,
> Mathias


I obviously meant to create a RAID0, not a RAID10, over the 3 RAID10 devices.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux