Dear Sebastian, thanks for your valuable response. Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2013, 10:07:24 schrieb Sebastian Riemer: > On 29.01.2013 23:14, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > [...] > > > ~# cat /proc/mdstat > > Personalities : [raid1] [raid0] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > > md3 : active raid1 sda4[0] > > > > 869702736 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [U_] > > bitmap: 57/415 pages [228KB], 1024KB chunk > > > > md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] > > > > 96376 blocks super 1.0 [2/1] [U_] > > bitmap: 1/6 pages [4KB], 8KB chunk > > > > md1 : active (auto-read-only) raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] > > > > 2096468 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU] > > bitmap: 0/8 pages [0KB], 128KB chunk > > > > md124 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] > > > > 104856180 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU] > > bitmap: 8/200 pages [32KB], 256KB chunk > > > > This looks like some kind of race during device detection. > > The full boot sequence log leading to this mess is attached. > > [...] > > > Could some kind soul tell me, what's going on here? > > Funny, we've observed similar strange behavior when putting MD devices > on iSCSI/SRP exports. We connect to the SCSI target and udev does lots > of crap assembling only 1/2 or even 0/2 devices. This is why we disable > all udev rules related to MD and do it by custom scripts. Oh, I see. Forgot to mention, I do not enjoy fiddling in mkinitrd code ;-) (been there, had to do that for my aufs2 based diskless setups) > In mdadm 3.2.6 a possible fix has been introduced. > > Check: git log mdadm-3.2.5..mdadm-3.2.6 > > > commit 090900c3d2eb5b3aef5251a21228483c32246cc7 > Author: Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon Aug 13 08:00:21 2012 +1000 > > udev-rules: prevent systemd from mount devices before they are ready. > > commit b7e05d2373313dd8d0cb687479ad58a88f37d29f > Author: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> > Date: Thu May 24 11:49:49 2012 +1000 > > udev-rules: prevent systemd from mount devices before they are ready. > > > Does mdadm 3.2.6 solve this? Hmm, according to mdadm from openSUSE:12.1:Update, the relevant fixes should be in place. It might be an unfortunate combination of this issue and the asynchronously applied updates, interfered by the *switching* behavior. I started with regenerating the initrds now, and a first reboot succeeded so far. Good. Will ask my friend to reboot the system a dozen times tonight. Thanks, Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html