Dear Piergiorgio Sartor, In message <20130128204422.GA14115@xxxxxxxx> you wrote: > > It could still be the data is as it was written, > but, for some reasons I could not imagine, the > parities (both) are not correct. This is what I think at the moment, as all my samples of data so fare looked ok. > This could be in case of some software bug, which > would be quite a surprise, I must say. Indeed. Guess how I feel... > Still, would be nice to check if the whole array > is it this state or if, sooner or later, some > knwon slot (with error) is found somewhere else. Checks still running. I see two things: - on the array where I was running "repair" before, raid6check reports no errors so far - but still there is a mismatch_cnt = 362731480 raid6check is still running. - on the second machine, I have 558579 lines out output, 176 of which are errors of type "Error detected at : disk slot unknown"; no other errors reported so far. raid6check is still running. - on the third machine, I have 5512894 lines out output, 1599431 of which are errors of type "Error detected at : disk slot unknown"; no other errors reported so far. raid6check is still running. This smells really bad as if parity computation was broken... OK, add more hardware details... A: Supermicro X8SAX mainboard, Core i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz, 24 GB RAM H: Supermicro X8ST3 mainboard, Xeon CPU W3565 @ 3.20GHz, 24 GB RAM X: Supermicro X8SAX mainboard, Core i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz, 24 GB RAM Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@xxxxxxx What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html