Re: Disk speed comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > WD2001FASS: 4x500GB platters
> > HDS723020BLA642: 3x667GB platters
> >
> > - Shouldn't higher density normally mean higher speed?
> 
> Depends...that assumes that the tracks on each manufacturers disks is
> the same...the higher density platters could have more tracks and
> because of that lower date per track and lower bit rates per track.
> 
> Check what the manufacturer says on bit rates under the head.

hrmf - can't find any data on that from WD - Hitachi is quite clear on that part, though… http://www.hgst.com/internal-drives/desktop/deskstar/deskstar-7k3000
-- 
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux