[PATCH 0 of 4] MD RAID10: Improve redundancy of RAID10 'far' and 'offset' algorithms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil,

I've changed the way 'far' and 'offset' algorithms are done to reflect
your latest suggestions.  The case where there were a non-multiple of
'far_copies' devices in the array was the tricky issue we were dealing
with.  I've separated my patch into two - one dealing with the
multiple-of-far_copies case and the other dealing with the non-multiple
case.

I had to make some adjustments to the dm-raid patch that includes the
new 'far' and 'offset' algorithms and I've included that revised patch
in this set.

[PATCH 1 of 4]MD RAID10: Minor non-functional code changes
[PATCH 2 of 4]MD RAID10:  Improve redundancy for 'far' and 'offset' algorithms (part 1)
[PATCH 3 of 4]MD RAID10:  Improve redundancy for 'far' and 'offset' algorithms (part 2)
[PATCH 4 of 4]DM RAID:  Add support for MD's RAID10 "far" and "offset" algorithms

Thanks,
 brassow

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux